leadership dot #5061: merger

Businesses and nonprofit organizations have recently undergone many mergers, consolidations, and buyouts. All of these raise questions about culture and how the transition to the new configuration will be managed.

It’s important in the early stages to define the intended outcome. Is entity A absorbing entity B, and the smaller entity is expected to adopt the procedures and processes of the buyer? This happens when a big bank buys a smaller branch, and the identity of the small bank disappears.

Or, are A and B combining to create a new option C, with a new structure and name? This happened when a neighboring school district realigned its facilities and merged two high schools into one new United High.

Whether it involves a multi-million-dollar conglomerate or a few small departments in the same organization, clarifying the goal is essential. The alignment won’t be easy, but proactively orchestrating the transition is much better than the consequences of ongoing misalignment.

leadership dot #5060: façade

There is someone running for one of our local offices who I think would be great in the position. They are thorough and thoughtful, which would be admirable qualities in the role, but it could be challenging to get elected because of their soft-spoken nature.

Another candidate is the opposite—charismatic and seemingly likable—until you dig deeper and realize there isn’t much depth beneath the surface. Their personality may give them an advantage as a candidate, but they appear more interested in getting elected than in actually doing the job.

It’s the old sizzle vs. steak scenario — where a lot of hype plays well in the moment, but what you really want is meat behind the initial bravado. It’s true for political candidates, but it’s also an apt analogy for interviews, marketing, relationships, and really, for most things.

Do some digging to get to the next layer before being seduced by the sizzle.

leadership dot #5059: Tuesday

Recently, I went down the rabbit hole looking through my old photos to free up space on my computer. I noticed that, in many cases, I spent more time looking at the backgrounds than at the subjects.

  • Oh, remember what the yard next door looked like before they put in a pool…
  • Look how small that tree was, and now it towers over the house…
  • Whatever happened to that necklace? I really liked it…
  • OMG, my desk is a mess. Why did I have all those piles?…
  • Look at how big and bulky that computer is!…
  • What was I thinking with that pattern on the chair?…
  • Oh, I forgot about that knickknack that was always in our kitchen…

And on it went. As much reminiscing as deleting, but I did manage to purge several hundred photos.

It inspired me to take pictures of today’s “ordinary” — the moments that make up daily life, not just the special occasions or vacations. One of author Dan Pink’s cheat codes is to “make your decisions based on what it would be like on an ordinary Tuesday, not on a fantasy Saturday.” I think it’s a good guide for your photography, too.

leadership dot #5056: add-ons

Travel deal website Trivago seems to have taken a lesson from the airlines by trying to extract money from consumers for every little thing. Now, if you want customer service to answer the phone “faster,” you need to pay $4.99! (No mention of how long you will be on hold if you opt for the free standard phone support.)

In addition, the site got on the bandwagon of pervasive tipping, and now suggests an extra contribution of 3-10% to allow them “to keep developing more ways to save!” It sounds more like they are developing more ways to reduce the discount they are purportedly providing you.

Instead of bolstering profits, the nickel and dime mentality chips away at customer satisfaction and the brand’s reputation. Cut out all the extraneous charges and provide your service at one fair price.

Thanks, Meg!

leadership dot #5055: balcony

A strategy recommended for leaders leading adaptive change is to get on the balcony rather than the dance floor (see dot #1181). Having an overview of the situation allows them to gain perspective and assess the full system instead of seeing only one part in their current view.

The Detroit Police Department understands the importance of this overview and creates a literal balcony to achieve it. The Department uses special police lift stations at special events where crowds gather. By having officers high above the action, they can more easily assess a situation and direct help where it is most needed.

Soccer players create a metaphorical balcony, relying on their center midfielder and goalie to have a holistic view of the field and to share their perspective with the rest of the team. Other players may be focused on the ball and immediate play in front of them, but the center mid’s role is to see the whole field and relay strategy to their teammates.

While implementation requires hands-on engagement, assessing strategy requires a hands-off perspective that only comes from stepping out of the narrow fray. Find ways to create your own balcony before you jump in and act based on a limited view.

Source: Balcony/dance floor concept from Leadership on the Line by Heifetz and Linsky.

leadership dot #5054: hot seat

When you’re a low-level individual contributor, your primary job is to keep your boss happy. You may do that by keeping customers happy too, but your overall focus is pretty narrow.

As you climb the ladder and have a wider scope of responsibility, you have more stakeholders, and the higher the position, the more the work becomes managing the interests of others. A CEO has to balance the desires of employees, customers, suppliers, the board, regulators, and community interests. A superintendent tries to find a middle ground between teachers, staff, students, parents, the board, unions, legislators, and the public. A nonprofit leader must manage donors, national foundations/funders, staff, financial advisors, and community needs.

The more stakeholders are involved, the more likely they are to have competing interests. When people wonder why leaders are paid higher salaries, much of it is because of their skill in balancing multiple demands — knowing what to prioritize, what decision to make, and being able to successfully articulate to the other parties why their preferred course of action did not happen.

Many think of the leader as being at the top of the organizational hierarchy. In reality, they’re the ones smack dab in the center, getting input and taking heat from all sides. If you aspire to move up, start by practicing being in the middle.

leadership dot #5053: life stages

Most people are conscious of the evolving developmental stages in children or pets, but fewer consider the life stages of an organization.

A recent board training reminded me that nonprofits (among other organizations) move through stages as the organization evolves.

  • Stage 1: Vision: where a founder(s) sees a possibility and imagines how an organization can fulfill it
  • Stage 2: Start-up: the organization becomes a reality and begins implementation
  • Stage 3: Building a foundation: Where processes allow the organization to grow
  • Stage 4: Maturity: The focus shifts from an entrepreneurial beginning to one of sustainability
  • Stage 5: Change: Requiring a refocus and review of the original mission and how to meet it
  • Stage 6: Dissolution: When the need has been met or the infrastructure to proceed ends

Organizations don’t move through stages linearly; instead, they may move back and forth between earlier stages as personnel, the environment, and circumstances change. I think of leadership dots and the decision to rethink the number of days I publish (stage 5), allowing the organization (me) to continue (stage 4). Without this renewal, I think I would have been close to stage 6.]

Where is your organization today? Assessing your organization through this lens may clarify where to focus and what resources you need to thrive.

Source: Board Bootcamp, Community Foundation of Greater Dubuque

leadership dot #5052: resources

I think about all the times we do things ourselves instead of taking advantage of available help, and I wonder why. Sometimes money is an issue, but often enlisting a professional feels like admitting defeat or going against our identity as someone who can do it on their own. It’s odd to feel guilty about using resources, but I think it often happens.

Examples include:

  • Believing you should be able to train your puppy yourself instead of taking it to obedience lessons
  • Thinking it’s just that you don’t have the willpower to diet on your own vs being prescribed GPL-1 medications
  • Feeling that you should just know how to handle supervisory situations instead of hiring an executive coach for help
  • Believeing you must spend hours doing your own analysis for it to be real instead of deploying AI to compile a project for you
  • Thinking you should be able to see organizational issues and solutions yourself rather than needing to bring in a consultant
  • Expecting that you should be able to bring your home’s vision to life on your own rather than needing an interior decorator to pick out colors and furniture
  • Feeling like you should have the internal discipline and knowledge to regularly work out on your own instead of hiring a personal trainer
  • Struggling with over-the-counter meds rather than making a doctor’s appointment

Using resources is a sign of strength, not weakness. You don’t always have to take the hard road.

leadership dot #5050: slights

If you’ve participated in any type of DEI training, it’s likely that you are familiar with the concept of microaggressions — small, often unintentional actions or language that are offensive to others. By understanding the history or context behind these microaggressions, you can avoid using them and communicate more respectfully.

The same premise applies to slights against women. Taylor Black compiled a collection of microfeminisms that may cause you to rethink whether you have unknowingly been favoring men over women in your speech or actions. Examples include:

  • I work at a school, and when I have to call parents to pick up their sick kid, I call the dad first.
  • I ask my kindergarten students what dad cooked for dinner last night and get very shocked if they say their mom cooked.
  • I introduce my friends and their husbands in that order and add a superficial adjective before the husband. Like, this is Jane and her beautiful husband, Joe.
  • I call male politicians by their first names only.
  • I’m a yearbook editor, and for all the women’s sports, I simply have the sport’s name. But for the men’s, I put boys’ in front of each of them, i.e., soccer and boys’ soccer.
  • Whenever a dad says he’s babysitting the kids or watching the kids, I say, Oh, so you mean you’re just parenting?
  • I’m a travel agent, and I always book the flights to pair the child with the husband.
  • I ask men, “Do you work?” instead of “What do you do for work?”

I admit that some of these hit home (Kamala or Hillary, anyone?), and it raised my consciousness about other ways that I make assumptions that stereotype women in lesser-than ways. Continue to learn about micro slights that can have macro impact, whether about gender, race, or any other distinction. We all have opportunities do better.

Thanks, Meg!

leadership dot #5049: bulldozer

There is a difference between what you say and how you say it. People who come across as bullies may have great ideas, but resistance to their tone often overshadows their message. Those who speak more than they listen may find themselves ignored, and shouting is rarely effective. People who want to make change are usually more successful when they ask questions and seek input, rather than make declarations.

Even if you wear your bravo with pride, there are few roles where being a bulldozer is an asset, especially on a team. The method matters.