leadership dot #313a: wet towel

Enjoy re-reading some of my favorite dots for a few days while I enjoy some time away….

When someone gets all worked up about something, the temptation is often to share their emotions with the first person around. Many times this plays out like someone vomiting in a cartoon — the words just blather out and spew all over the listener. The original party may feel better, but those who were the recipients of the sharing now have the burden of dealing with the emotions as well.  

Like a stain on their shirt, they may choose to ignore it, but it is there nonetheless. More often than not, they don’t/can’t/won’t forget it is there, so the time and emotional energy invested in the issue multiplies.  


In most instances, everyone would be better off if the original speaker allowed for an element of time to pass before sharing. Time has the ability to decompress emotion and put things into a much more reasoned perspective. Think of emotion as water being soaked up by a towel. Time is equivalent to ringing out the water, so that the towel may be easily passed on to another without fanfare or incident.  If you hand someone a soaking wet towel, all the attention turns to dealing with the water rather than the towel. If you have let the emotion pass through, the actual issue may be addressed.


Next time you’re tempted to vent or insert drama into a situation, ask yourself if you really need to hand off the towel while it is soaking wet or whether everyone would be better off if you waited a bit before doing so.  I’ll bet you know the right answer.

Originally published in modified form on April 10, 2013



leadership dot #4931: triggered

Everyone has been in situations that created ire and where emotions rise.

The key is what happens next. You may pout or let your anger fester, causing drama as it lingers beyond the immediate interaction, or you can repress it and move on as if nothing had occurred.

What happens less frequently is taking a few minutes to reflect on what caused the emotion in the first place. What triggered your emotion — was it something that was said, or not said? Did the setting contribute to the situation? Was it the timing? Did past circumstances influence emotions in the present? What could you have done differently? What did you learn to help you the next time a similar situation occurs?

Getting past the initial drama is better than carrying it around, but don’t move on without some self-reflection. You can’t regulate what you don’t understand.

leadership dot #4926: receptiveness

In preparation for a class I’m about to teach on negotiation and conflict management, I’m reading a new book, How to Disagree Better. It’s a skill we could all use, myself included.

Author and Harvard professor Julia Minson believes that “receptiveness” is a key in this endeavor, meaning a person’s “willingness to access, consider, and evaluate supporting and opposing information in a relatively impartial manner.” It is centered on this notion of considering other viewpoints, rather than trying to persuade the other person.

Receptiveness is comprised of four components:

1. Emotional Equanimity — the ability to regulate emotions and remain calm when confronted with opposing views

2. Intellectual Curiosity — how curious you are about the rationale and origin of another’s beliefs

3. Respect Toward Opponents — feelings toward those who disagree with you

4. Tolerance of Taboo Issues — your willingness to discuss issues that are sensitive for you

Minson writes, “receptiveness is not about thoughts and feelings, but how you behave towards others.” You are able to assess your level of receptiveness via a (free) assessment, and by identifying which of the four factors comes most easily to you, you can first begin to strengthen your skills in that area.

Whether at home, work, in the political arena, or in the community, everyone encounters others who hold opposing views. Be receptive to learning new ways of receptiveness and make your life more pleasant overall.

Source: How to Disagree Better by Julia Minson, 2026
Assessment: disagreeingbetter.com/survey


leadership dot #4924: confidence

A recent discussion brought up the concept of emotional confidence vs. executional confidence.

When performing a task or implementing a project, people can appear confident and be perceived as having their act together, but inside, they don’t feel it. While the work comes off well, the one who executed it is full of self-doubt. They are confident in their ability to accomplish the goal, but less secure in their own value.

And if the work is consistently good, it becomes expected, and the affirmations trail off, leaving space for even more doubt to creep in.

Don’t assume that those doing good work know that their performance is strong. Give positive feedback about the outcomes, in addition to praising the person who achieved them. Emotion and execution are two separate things.

leadership dot #4919: tolerate

If you want different behaviors from people, watch what you tolerate.

We know this from raising pets. If you allow that cut puppy to jump on you, that big dog will jump on you, too. If you put up with indiscriminate barking in the beginning, chances are you’ll have a barker for life.

But we sometimes fail to make that connection with people and allow others to continue with behaviors that should have been stopped when they first started.

We tolerate:

  • Someone who dominates at every meeting, instead of initially establishing group ground rules
  • Someone who never speaks up, instead of calling on them and prompting input
  • People turning in late work, instead of creating consequences for doing so
  • Inappropriate remarks from others, instead of calling them out on them
  • Others who fail to carry their weight on projects, instead of holding them accountable
  • People who are perpetually late by waiting, instead of proceeding without them

Our actions (or inactions) teach others how to treat us. The longer you allow a behavior you don’t like to continue, the harder it is to course-correct. Stop tolerating and speak up.

leadership dot #4914: venting

We’ve all been there — something happens to us that gets us riled up, and our instinctual reaction is to vent to someone about it. It may make us feel better or provide positive reinforcement in a negative situation, but rarely does any good come from it. It drains time and energy and sucks others into the drama.

Being able to regulate emotions is one of the key factors in Emotional Intelligence, something that must be learned the more senior you are in the hierarchy. No one benefits when the leader rants or inappropriately shares another’s misstep.

But if you can’t control your emotions entirely, two guidelines that can keep you from making it worse:

  1. Resist sharing until you can do so without drama. I liken this to throwing a wet towel (dot #313) — you need to wait until the “wet” has dissipated before you share, or the only focus will be on the emotion, not the content.
  2. If you must involve someone else, be sure to “vent up,” never “vent down.” You may need to unburden yourself, but do so with a supervisor or someone up the hierarchy. Not only does this serve as a litmus test as to whether the sharing is appropriate, but it also keeps you from unfairly involving your staff in your issues.

Be mature enough to modulate your highs and lows and resist the urge to vent immediately. In most cases, this, too, shall pass without you acting out about it.

leadership dot #4913: no surprises

Today is April Fool’s Day, so you should be on high alert for pranksters. It’s a day for pulling practical jokes and preying on people’s gullibility in good fun.

Unfortunately, throughout the year, there are times when it feels like someone is pulling an April Fool’s joke, but they are serious. I hear the refrain “You’ve got to be kidding,” in my head, but the head-spinning proclamation from above turns out to be true.

People reluctantly put up with jokes on April 1, but on the whole, surprises in the workplace are unwelcome. Conduct yourself so that you aren’t pulling fast ones on your team. Deliver news with notice, not punch lines.

leadership dot #4911: look ahead

When a project or event ends, it’s tempting to ruminate over all the things you could have/should have done differently. Depending on your focus, this can be helpful or self-defeating.

If the focus of your thinking is on the past, you may find yourself losing confidence in your abilities as you tick off all the ways you could have done better. This self-flagellation serves no purpose other than to drain your self-esteem. However, if your thoughts focus on the future and how the project could be improved the next time, that process can be very helpful in identifying lessons learned for the next round.

We can always do more. The key is to put a period, not a comma, at the end of a project and let it stand. “The event was good. Next time it will be even better when we do X.” (period) vs. “The event was good, but we could have done X instead.” (comma)

Expend your energy on what comes next instead of getting stuck in the doom loop of regret over things you can’t change. Your confidence and project will both be better if you keep the emphasis on looking ahead, not back.

leadership dot #4907: skill set

I’ve written before (dot #418) about “T-people,” a term used by IBM to describe those with breadth in many areas (the cross-bar of the T) and depth in one area (the stem of the T). IBM preferred to hire those with that breadth over those who were specialists in a narrow area.

I’ve spoken with several people who have that breadth and expertise in a given area, but they underestimate the value of where their talents lie. For example, one person is an organizational whiz, another has deep experience with volunteers, but they don’t see those skills as “T-stem-worthy.”

Expertise in an area doesn’t have to be in a subject. It can be a skill set you may take for granted, but that is not present in most others. It could be facilitation skills, negotiation, conflict resolution, galvanizing teams, or hundreds of other “soft skills” that not everyone possesses. It could even be being a generalist in a field surrounded by specialists.

Think about where you have special talents. They probably come so naturally to you that you don’t always identify them as your “T-stem,” but being able to articulate them helps enhance your impact and contribution. What skill set do you have that suits you to a T?

leadership dot #4906: ready to go

I saw a post on Facebook where someone made complete birthday cake kits to donate to their food bank. The kits were packaged in a foil baking pan and included cake mix, frosting, candles, and a Happy Birthday banner. What stood out to me was that they also included a can of Sprite and instructions on how to substitute eggs and oil (that the recipient may not have) for the soda, which surprisingly works just as well.

The person making the kits went the extra mile to ensure it was ready to use when submitted. The recipient didn’t need to acquire any additional items or take any extra steps (other than baking the cake itself).

It was a good example of providing a complete product, a lesson that many in the workplace could learn from. Sometimes, work is submitted that needs editing or additional information, putting the burden on the supervisor to revise or track down data. Work that’s ready to go is something to celebrate.

Screenshot from the Family Nutritionist post