I understand the intent of the Motion Picture Rating System, but sometimes I can’t figure out how they come up with the ratings they do. In addition to labeling a film G, PG, etc., the rating system now indicates a rationale for why the rating was given. My favorite: Ford v Ferrari – the movie about race cars, received a PG-13 in part because of “fast driving!!”

The rating system is done by a board of parents – not movie executives – who are employed by the Classification and Rating Administration to reflect “what they believe would be the majority view of their fellow parents in rating a film.” The descriptors are designed to help parents know what type of content gave the film a non-G rating, including language, smoking, sex, “extended sequences of intense fantasy”, violence, “frightening images”, and, apparently, fast driving.

With any type of rating system, the results are inherently subjective. Almost every movie has something that someone too young could find scary or objectionable. Even Frozen received a PG for “mild action and rude humor” and that was far less intense than some of the classics like Bambi.

The bottom line is to take context into account with any rating system. It’s hard to develop hard and fast rules that apply across a wide spectrum of content and reflect different values. What movie is appropriate for your kids, what restaurant is “the best”, what college ranks highest on your list – all are subjective decisions. Utilize ratings to inform you, but not to decide for you. Fast driving in a race car movie is a very good thing.

I'm the chief connector at leadership dots where I serve as "the string" for individuals and organizations. Like stringing pearls together to make a necklace, "being the string" is an intentional way of thinking and behaving – making linkages between things that otherwise appear random or unconnected – whether that be supervising a staff, completing a dissertation or advancing a project in the workplace. I share daily leadership dots on my blog to provide examples of “the string” in action. I use the string philosophy through coaching, consulting and teaching to help others build capacity in themselves and their organizations. I craft analogies and metaphors that help people comprehend complex topics and understand their role in the system. My favorite work involves helping those new to supervision or newly promoted supervisors build confidence and learn the skills necessary to effectively lead their team.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: