Today’s dot was written by Brooklyn Hanelt from Minot State University.
When I choose partners for collaborative assignments, I often try to pair up with peers who study hard but don’t always get grades that reflect their efforts. I have been asked before why I do this, and it is simple: effort means much more in life in every way.
I find working with individuals who are naturally smart to be challenging. I am not naturally intelligent; I struggle beyond belief behind closed doors, even if I have created the illusion of being naturally smart. In my experience, naturally smart lab and group partners in school can be exhausting and, at times, self-serving. They don’t always work well in groups, as they often find it frustrating when asked to communicate concepts, which can sometimes yield little respect and compassion, and in some cases, a lack of self-awareness of the situation.
Whereas, pairing with peers who put in the effort without always reaping the benefits has never failed me. No one leaves confused, dazed, upset, or worse: pegged with an extra task. When a collaborative group creates a nurturing environment, everyone flourishes and feels appreciated, in turn expanding our leadership skills.
In every aspect of life, grit supersedes raw intelligence. You cannot teach Albert Einstein or Issac Newton to bench 400 pounds or run a marathon with their brain. People have to want it themselves; the reps in the shadows are greatly overlooked. I would much rather receive a lower grade in a group assignment if it means making friends, respecting others, and growing leadership skills together.
Where opinions and concerns can be communicated without fear, and tasks can be selected based on strengths and skills. Greatness is never given; it is built, and I would much rather build it with those who understand the weight of work than those who only know the view from the top.
