When I write grants, they are organized around a Logic Model that helps clarify the components of the project. If I can work with the grantee to articulate the logic in a compelling, succinct way I know that the grant stands a good chance of being funded.

The Logic Model begins with a program goal – the overall aim or intended impact of the project. Next, two components that describe HOW the goal will be achieved are outlined: Resources (the inputs dedicated to or consumed by the program) and Activities (the actions that the program takes to achieve the desired outcomes). Finally, two components that describe the WHY or “so what” of the project are clarified: Outputs (the measurable projects of a program’s activities) and then the Outcomes (the benefits to clients, communities, systems or organizations). Resources are needed for Activities which lead to Outputs which cause Outcomes. It sounds very simple, but many hours have been spent wrestling with how to communicate these categories.

The Alia Innovation Cohort members also have struggled to put their overall change aspirations into succinct language. They have been striving to articulate their Theory of Change that describes the aspect of the child welfare reform that their jurisdiction is addressing through completion of this sentence:  “Because we believe that children fare better with protective connections in family, and ____ (#) children in ____ (county) are not living safely within their families, we are ___________(thing they are changing), so that __________ (change they expect to see). We believe this will work because _______ (evidence).” It, too, sounds easy to complete, but it the simplicity belies the difficulty of it.

Mark Twain said: “I didn’t have time to write a short letter so I wrote a long one instead.” His logic rings true for grant writing, theories of change and most forms of communication. It takes time to edit out all the wiggle words, meaningless phrases and fluff, but the power comes from that clarification.

Logic Model Source: The Office of Minority Health Resource Center, http://www.minorityhealth.hhs.gov

About the Author leadership dots by dr. beth triplett

I'm the chief connector at leadership dots where I serve as "the string" for individuals and organizations. Like stringing pearls together to make a necklace, "being the string" is an intentional way of thinking and behaving – making linkages between things that otherwise appear random or unconnected – whether that be supervising a staff, completing a dissertation or advancing a project in the workplace. I share daily leadership dots on my blog to provide examples of “the string” in action. I use the string philosophy through coaching, consulting and teaching to help others build capacity in themselves and their organizations. I craft analogies and metaphors that help people comprehend complex topics and understand their role in the system. My favorite work involves helping those new to supervision or newly promoted supervisors build confidence and learn the skills necessary to effectively lead their team.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: